by Richard Evans, henrymakow.com
In March 2007, retired General Wesley Clark told Amy Goodman that the Pentagon already had plans as early as September 2001 to take down seven Islamic countries, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.
In 1997, a group of Republicans formed a non-profit organization called the Project For A New American Century
(PNAC). In their first white paper, Rebuilding America's Defenses, they
proposed taking down Saddam Hussein, Iraq and then reordering the
entire Middle East. Parenthetically, they admitted that selling such
plans to the American people would take a long time, "absent some
catastrophic catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor." (p.51)
September 11, 2001 was obviously just what they had in mind.
In
2000, the US Supreme Court selected another Bush as the 43rd US
President and he waited until 9/11 to begin reordering the world.
In that connection, in March 2007, retired General Wesley Clark told Amy Goodman on her Democracy Now TV program that as early as September 2001, the Pentagon already had plans to
take down seven Islamic countries, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya,
Somalia, Sudan and Iran. If you have not seen the short You Tube of
General Clark's revelations on Democracy Now, it is worth watching
At
that time, I was skeptical about such a large US Military operation,
because we all knew The Bush Administration lied us into Iraq with phony
stories of Weapons of Mass Destruction, yellowcake uranium, mobile
biological weapons labs, etc.
In
2007, the US Military only occupied Afghanistan and Iraq, so I asked
myself, "How will The White House justify the military cost to the
American people of invading Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and
Iran?"
By
2011, the answer became clear. The unnecessary wars against Syria,
Lebanon, Libya, Somalia and Sudan would be staged covertly as irregular
military coups with the US Military and CIA supporting PHONY democracy
movements.
Remember
the baloney about 'Arab Spring' and the spontaneous 'Twitter'
revolutions supporting "civil unrest" in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya?
Was the USA behind these civil wars and bogus democracy movements? OF COURSE!
Remember 2011 when Libyan
Al-Qaeda could not budge Gaddafi's Libyan Army, the US and NATO enforced
a NO Fly Zone over Libya and launched hundreds of cruise missiles in
support of Al-Qaeda and the rebels.
By
Oct 20, 2011 Muammar Gaddafi was a deadman and Libya was a war torn
shattered nation. But no one in America feels the least bit guilty about
America's role in trashing Libya. Most people believe these events were
spontaneous democratic revolutions. Doesn't anyone remember the PNAC's plans to reorder the Middle East?
GADDAFI RESISTANCE KILLED US AMBASSADOR
In
Libya last month, we lost Ambassador Steven in an attack on the US
Consulate in Benghazi. The press wants us to think that we brought
"freedom and democracy" to Libya, not chaos and death. They want us to
believe that there is no Green Resistance to the NATO or its Al-Qaeda
allies in Benghazi, but everyone in Libya knows about the Green
Resistance, whose members are called "Tahloob" (Arabic for "Gaddafi
loyalists").
In reality, the Green Resistance destroyed the US Consulate in Benghazi September
11, 2012. They have been increasingly active since shortly after the
murder of Muammar Gaddafi in October 2011. They strike any NATO target
they can, and they execute key Libyans who betrayed Gaddafi and sided
with NATO. The Benghazi incident was merely their latest blow against
what they see as NATO's illegal occupation of their country. Ignoring
the Tahloob only happens outside of Libya, by the NATO powers and their
subservient media.
In
Egypt, President Mohamed Morsi of the radical Muslim Brotherhood
replaced moderate Hosni Mubarak, yet the civil unrest in Egypt
continues. While Obama and Romney trade accusations about whether The
Obama Administration was guilty of leaving the grounds of the Benghazi
Consulate vulnerable, THERE IS NO SERIOUS DISCUSSION REGARDING WHETHER
THE US MILITARY SHOULD SUPPORT THESE PHONY REVOLUTIONS IN THE FIRST
PLACE.
WAGING WAR WITHOUT PERMISSION
What
is even more disturbing is the US Congress is side-stepping its US
Constitutional duty to declare war, but the press ignores their failure
too. The CIA shouldn't decide whether we go to war. The US Congress
should debate and decide, so Congressmen can be responsible to the
American people come election time.
There
is a Constitutional debate in America regarding whether Obama is in
violation of the War Power Act in regard to Libya, BUT THE MEDIA IGNORES
THIS VIOLATION.
"May
20, 2011, marked the 60th day of US combat in Libya (as part of the UN
resolution) but the deadline arrived without President Obama seeking
specific authorization from the US Congress. President Obama, however,
notified Congress that no authorization was needed, since the US
leadership was transferred to NATO, and since US involvement is somewhat
limited. On Friday, June 3, 2011, the US House of Representatives voted
to rebuke President Obama for maintaining an American presence in the
NATO operations in Libya, which they considered a violation of the War
Powers Resolution." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Resolution
So
how is this reordering of the Middle East progressing? Friday, October
19, 2012, a huge car bomb in a Christian Beirut neighborhood killed
Lebanon's security chief, General Wissam al-Hassan along with seven
others and wounding eighty or more people.
Two
days after that, a similar car bomb ripped through the Christian Old
Town of Damascus. Two days later, Tuesday, October 23, three car bombs
in Baghdad killed nine people and wounded 26.
If
anyone seriously wonders WHO WOULD DO SUCH AWEFUL THINGS? -- they
should recall the PNAC's plans and Wesley Clark's revelations to Amy
Goodman.
No comments:
Post a Comment