How MI6, CIA spend tax money on propping up drug production

RT (Russia Today)

Annie Machon is a former intel­li­gence officer for the UK's MI5, who resigned in 1996 to blow the whistle. She is now a writer, public speaker and a Director of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition.

Get short URL

Published time: May 07, 2013 10:48
Edited time: May 07, 2013 12:01

An Afghan farmer collects raw opium as he works in a poppy field in Khogyani District of Nangarhar province on April 29, 2013. (AFP Photo)

Share on Tumblr

Afghan President Hamid Karzai, has recently been criticized for taking 'ghost money' from the CIA and MI6. The sums are unknown – for the usual reasons of 'national security' – but are estimated to have been in the tens of millions of dollars. While this is nowhere near the eye-bleeding $12 billionshipped over to Iraq on pallets in the wake of the invasion a decade ago, it is still a significant amount.With both the CIA and MI6 secretly providing 'ghost money' bribes to the Afghan political establishment, it’s likely that Afghans will increasingly support a resurgent Taliban and the drug trade will be further propped up.

And how has this money been spent?  Certainly not on social projects or rebuilding initiatives.  Rather, the reporting indicates, the money has been funneled to Karzai's cronies as bribes in a corrupt attempt to buy influence in the country.

None of this surprises me. MI6 has a long and ignoble history of trying to buy influence in countries of interest.  In 1995/96 it funded a 'ragtag group of Islamic extremists,' headed up by a Libyan military intelligence officer, in an illegal attempt to try to assassinate Colonel Gaddafi.  The attack went wrong and innocent people were killed. When this scandal was exposed, it caused an outcry.

Yet a mere 15 years later, MI6 and the CIA were back in Libya, providing support to the same 'rebels,' who this time succeeded in capturing, torturing and killing Gaddafi, while plunging Libya into apparently endless internecine war. This time around there was little international outcry, as the world's media portrayed this aggressive interference in a sovereign state as 'humanitarian relief.'

And we also see the same in Syria now, as the CIA and MI6 are already providing training and communication support to the rebels – many of whom, particularly the Al Nusra faction in control of the oil-rich north-east of Syria are in fact allied with Al-Qaeda in Iraq.  So in some countries the UK and USA use drones to target and murder "militants" (plus villagers, wedding parties and other assorted innocents), while in others they back ideologically similar groups.

fghan policemen destroys a poppy field in the Nad-e Ali district of Helmand province on March 20, 2013. (AFP Photo)

Recently, we have also seen the Western media making unverified claims that the Syrian regime is using chemical weapons against its own people, and our politicians leaping on these assertions as justification for openly providing weapons to the insurgents.

Other reports are now emerging that indicate it was the rebels themselves who have been using sarin gas against the people. This may halt the rush to war, but not doubt other support will continue to be offered by the West to these war criminals.

So, how is MI6 secretly spending UK taxpayers' money in Afghanistan? According to Western media reporting, it is being used to prop up warlords and corrupt officials. This is deeply unpopular amongst the Afghan people, leading to the danger of increasing support for a resurgent Taliban.

There is also a significant overlap between the corrupt political establishment and the illegal drug trade, up to and including the president's late brother, Ahmed Wali Karzai. So, another unintentional consequence may be that some of this unaccountable ghost money is propping up the drug trade.

Afghanistan is the world's leading producer of heroin, and the UN reports that poppy growth has increased dramatically. Indeed, the UN estimates that acreage under poppy growth in Afghanistan hastripled over the last 7 years.  The value of the drug trade to the Afghan warlords is now estimated to be in the region of $700 million per year.  You can buy a lot of Kalashnikovs with that.

On the one hand, we have Western governments bankrupting themselves to fight the 'war on terror,' breaking international laws and murdering millions of innocent people across North Africa, the Middle East and central Asia, while at the same time shredding what remains of our hard-won civil liberties at home.

On the other hand, we apparently have MI6 and the CIA secretly bankrolling the very people in Afghanistan who produce 90 percent of the world's heroin. And then, of course, more scarce resources can be spent on fighting the failed 'war on drugs,' and yet another pretext is used to shred our civil liberties.

This is a lucrative economic model for the burgeoning military-security complex. However, it is a lose-lose scenario for the rest of us.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.

Source: http://rt.com/op-edge/mi6-cia-tax-money-drugs-941/

How the Illuminati is Reordering the Middle East

by Richard Evans, henrymakow.com

In March 2007, retired General Wesley Clark told Amy Goodman that the Pentagon already had plans as early as September 2001 to take down seven Islamic countries, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.

 

In 1997, a group of Republicans formed a non-profit organization called the Project For A New American Century (PNAC). In their first white paper, Rebuilding America's Defenses, they proposed taking down Saddam Hussein, Iraq and then reordering the entire Middle East. Parenthetically, they admitted that selling such plans to the American people would take a long time, "absent some catastrophic catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor." (p.51) 

September 11, 2001 was obviously just what they had in mind. 

In 2000, the US Supreme Court selected another Bush as the 43rd US President and he waited until 9/11 to begin reordering the world. 

In that connection, in March 2007, retired General Wesley Clark told Amy Goodman on her Democracy Now TV program that as early as September 2001, the Pentagon already had plans to take down seven Islamic countries, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. If you have not seen the short You Tube of General Clark's revelations on Democracy Now, it is worth watching 

At that time, I was skeptical about such a large US Military operation, because we all knew The Bush Administration lied us into Iraq with phony stories of Weapons of Mass Destruction, yellowcake uranium, mobile biological weapons labs, etc. 

In 2007, the US Military only occupied Afghanistan and Iraq, so I asked myself, "How will The White House justify the military cost to the American people of invading Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran?" 

By 2011, the answer became clear. The unnecessary wars against Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia and Sudan would be staged covertly as irregular military coups with the US Military and CIA supporting PHONY democracy movements.

Remember the baloney about 'Arab Spring' and the spontaneous 'Twitter' revolutions supporting "civil unrest" in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya? 

Was the USA behind these civil wars and bogus democracy movements? OF COURSE! 

 

Remember 2011 when Libyan Al-Qaeda could not budge Gaddafi's Libyan Army, the US and NATO enforced a NO Fly Zone over Libya and launched hundreds of cruise missiles in support of Al-Qaeda and the rebels. 

By Oct 20, 2011 Muammar Gaddafi was a deadman and Libya was a war torn shattered nation. But no one in America feels the least bit guilty about America's role in trashing Libya. Most people believe these events were spontaneous democratic revolutions. Doesn't anyone remember the PNAC's plans to reorder the Middle East?

GADDAFI RESISTANCE KILLED US AMBASSADOR 

In Libya last month, we lost Ambassador Steven in an attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi. The press wants us to think that we brought "freedom and democracy" to Libya, not chaos and death. They want us to believe that there is no Green Resistance to the NATO or its Al-Qaeda allies in Benghazi, but everyone in Libya knows about the Green Resistance, whose members are called "Tahloob" (Arabic for "Gaddafi loyalists"). 

In reality, the Green Resistance destroyed the US Consulate in Benghazi September 11, 2012. They have been increasingly active since shortly after the murder of Muammar Gaddafi in October 2011. They strike any NATO target they can, and they execute key Libyans who betrayed Gaddafi and sided with NATO. The Benghazi incident was merely their latest blow against what they see as NATO's illegal occupation of their country. Ignoring the Tahloob only happens outside of Libya, by the NATO powers and their subservient media. 

In Egypt, President Mohamed Morsi of the radical Muslim Brotherhood replaced moderate Hosni Mubarak, yet the civil unrest in Egypt continues.  While Obama and Romney trade accusations about whether The Obama Administration was guilty of leaving the grounds of the Benghazi Consulate vulnerable, THERE IS NO SERIOUS DISCUSSION REGARDING WHETHER THE US MILITARY SHOULD SUPPORT THESE PHONY REVOLUTIONS IN THE FIRST PLACE. 

WAGING WAR WITHOUT PERMISSION

What is even more disturbing is the US Congress is side-stepping its US Constitutional duty to declare war, but the press ignores their failure too. The CIA shouldn't decide whether we go to war. The US Congress should debate and decide, so Congressmen can be responsible to the American people come election time.

There is a Constitutional debate in America regarding whether Obama is in violation of the War Power Act in regard to Libya, BUT THE MEDIA IGNORES THIS VIOLATION. 

"May 20, 2011, marked the 60th day of US combat in Libya (as part of the UN resolution) but the deadline arrived without President Obama seeking specific authorization from the US Congress. President Obama, however, notified Congress that no authorization was needed, since the US leadership was transferred to NATO, and since US involvement is somewhat limited. On Friday, June 3, 2011, the US House of Representatives voted to rebuke President Obama for maintaining an American presence in the NATO operations in Libya, which they considered a violation of the War Powers Resolution." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Powers_Resolution

So how is this reordering of the Middle East progressing? Friday, October 19, 2012, a huge car bomb in a Christian Beirut neighborhood killed Lebanon's security chief, General Wissam al-Hassan along with seven others and wounding eighty or more people. 

Two days after that, a similar car bomb ripped through the Christian Old Town of Damascus. Two days later, Tuesday, October 23, three car bombs in Baghdad killed nine people and wounded 26.

If anyone seriously wonders WHO WOULD DO SUCH AWEFUL THINGS? -- they should recall the PNAC's plans and Wesley Clark's revelations to Amy Goodman.

Source: http://www.henrymakow.com/reordering-the-middle-east.html

 

Informant: NYPD paid me to 'bait' Muslims

By ADAM GOLDMAN and MATT APUZZO, Associated Press

NEW YORK (AP) -- A paid informant for the New York Police Department's intelligence unit was under orders to "bait" Muslims into saying inflammatory things as he lived a double life, snapping pictures inside mosques and collecting the names of innocent people attending study groups on Islam, he told The Associated Press. Shamiur Rahman, a 19-year-old American of Bangladeshi descent who has now denounced his work as an informant, said police told him to embrace a strategy called "create and capture." He said it involved creating a conversation about jihad or terrorism, then capturing the response to send to the NYPD. For his work, he earned as much as $1,000 a month and goodwill from the police after a string of minor marijuana arrests. "We need you to pretend to be one of them," Rahman recalled the police telling him. "It's street theater." Rahman said he now believes his work as an informant against Muslims in New York was "detrimental to the Constitution." After he disclosed to friends details about his work for the police - and after he told the police that he had been contacted by the AP - he stopped receiving text messages from his NYPD handler, "Steve," and his handler's NYPD phone number was disconnected. Rahman's account shows how the NYPD unleashed informants on Muslim neighborhoods, often without specific targets or criminal leads. Much of what Rahman said represents a tactic the NYPD has denied using. The AP corroborated Rahman's account through arrest records and weeks of text messages between Rahman and his police handler. The AP also reviewed the photos Rahman sent to police. Friends confirmed Rahman was at certain events when he said he was there, and former NYPD officials, while not personally familiar with Rahman, said the tactics he described were used by informants. Informants like Rahman are a central component of the NYPD's wide-ranging programs to monitor life in Muslim neighborhoods since the 2001 terrorist attacks. Police officers have eavesdropped inside Muslim businesses, trained video cameras on mosques and collected license plates of worshippers. Informants who trawl the mosques - known informally as "mosque crawlers" - tell police what the imam says at sermons and provide police lists of attendees, even when there's no evidence they committed a crime. The programs were built with unprecedented help from the CIA. Continue reading....

13th August London Olympics

by Kevin Boyle, No One To Vote For

Maybe something dreadful will happen.

Maybe nothing will happen at all.

If something does happen it will probably be in a form or manner that surprises us all.

The predictive-programming 'Conspiracy' films have been out there for a long time.

The current security chaos surrounding G4S and its Olympic security contract could mean anything. Preparing the ground for coming disaster. Resistance within elements of the local powers-that-be........

......anything. We cannot know.

What we can be sure of is this.

If any kind of mega-event takes place in London before, during or shorty after the Olympic games then the perpetrators will not be 'terrorists' or 'aliens' but persons acting under the direction of our real government, the international network of Judeo-Masonic finance oligarchs.

MOST OBVIOUS DAY OF DANGER

The opening and closing ceremonies have been flagged up as likely targets for terrorist attacks,  but it appears more likely that the most probable date for any such event is Monday 13th August.

This guess, right or wrong, is based on three pieces of information:

1) G4S Whistleblower Ben Fellows said he was advised that he would be involved in an event which he described as a “defining moment in the history of London” after the Olympics and so he naturally thought it would be during the Para Olympics……he was then advised it was nothing to do with the Olympics but with something else.

The 13th August is the day after the Olympics closing ceremony...........but perhaps the much-predicted 'event' could take place anywhere, even on an another continent, and be a 'defining moment' in the history of not only London but everywhere else besides.

2) A 2010 Rockefeller Foundation document entitled “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”  ‘predicts’ that the decade of 2010-2020 will be named “The Doom Decade”, because of  a wave of terrorist attacks, natural disasters as well as civil uprisings and financial collapses.

The years 2010 to 2020 were dubbed the “doom decade” for good reason: the 2012 Olympic bombing, which killed 13,000, was followed closely by an earthquake in Indonesia killing 40,000, a tsunami that almost wiped out Nicaragua, and the onset of the West China Famine, caused by a once-in-a-millennium drought linked to climate change.

Looked at rationally, this 'scenario' is pure fiction. However, we know by now that the people at the centre of power are occultists who communicate with each other in numerical codes based on their own 'magic numbers'.

Why the number 13,000? There is no obvious reason for choosing this. Such an article, however seemingly ridiculous, is certainly not purposeless. Michael Hoffman has written that it is part of the 'occult trajectory' for practitioners of the dark arts to signal their intentions to their friends and their victims in order to inform their friends and create a kind of  complicity in their victims and, thus, a real sense of helplessness in those outside the power nexus.

Does the 13 refer to the 13th August?

3) The 13th August 2012 can be written thus:

13/08/12 or, in the USA, 08/13/12

13 + 8 + 12 = 33

This is the most powerful and well-known masonic/satanic number after 666. 33 degree masons are said to have participated in the "Killing of the King" ritual.

Speculation such as this about False-Flag terrorist events is written, of course, in the hope that 


a) the propagation of such speculation will prevent any such planned event from going ahead.


b) people will understand who is responsible and who is not, should such an event  take place.

Source: http://kevboyle.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/13th-august-london-olympics.html

Silverstein's 9-11 Partner Owns Olympics "Gateway"

By Salman An-Noor Hossain, .www.henrymakow.com

July 19, 2012

 The new Westfield Stratford City Mall, bordered on its north side by the new Stratford International Station, dominates the Olympics site, dwarfing the Aquatics Centre and Olympics Stadium to the south

Westfield Stratford City Mall, Europe's largest urban shopping mall, opened Sept. 2011 in the heart of East London.

The mega-mall will also double as the London Subway gateway to the Olympics.


Former Israeli commando Frank Lowy, 81, recently opened the Mega Mall adjacent to Olympic Stadium and Stratford subway station.
Frank Lowy was Larry Silverstein's partner in the World Trade Center on Sept 11. 2001.

Over two-thirds of all those attending the Olympics stadium are expected to transit through Westfield's new "Stratford City Center."

Lowy, a dual Australian and Israeli citizen, is co-founder of the Westfield Group, operator of over 100 shopping centers in Australia, New Zealand, the United States and UK. They also own Marriott Hotels.
 
Both these companies have suffered a long list of "terrorist attacks" for which large insurance claims were made. 

A commercial promoting the London Underground as the main mode of transportation between different game sites in the Olympic village has marked the Stratford stadium with a red line connecting to it.

The Stratford station is also a part of both the Jubilee Line and Jubilee Extension Line.  Insider "Red Ox" said on this site (Comments) that either the Jubilee and/or Jubilee Extension had been targeted for terrorist bombing since 1989 (23 years ago)! This  information was given to him by Stella Rimington, ex-head of the Mi-5.

More ominous facts:

1) Insurance Companies To Pay Out At Least $7 Billion In Vested Interests in Case of Terrorism

This also happened prior to the 9-11 and 7-7 terrorist attacks. Certain companies and individuals are going to capitalize from the death and misery. Misery sure does love Insurance company!

The state-backed British Insurance company Pool Re is covering up to $7 Billion on the Olympic terror threat. Pool Re Chief Executive Steve Atkins said his team had closely scrutinized its customers' exposure to the Olympic Games. to prepare itself for a potential attack during the event.

Pool Re's biggest loss to date is the 260 million pounds it paid out after the Bishopsgate bomb in the City of London in 1993, and another 240 million pound plunge from the 1996 Manchester bombing. It is also expected to lose tens of millions from the July 7th 2005 terrorist attacks. It seems like Lowy is going to be just like his friend Lucky Larry (Silverstein) in the aftermath of the 9-11 attacks!!!

2) Mossad and Shin Beit Running "Anti-Terror" Security Drills

According to a May 2011 news article from Ynet News, the Mossad is involved in Olympics security. A source at the British Olympic Association said that "certain Israeli elements are advising us on securing the Olympic games." In addition, the Sayeret Yahalom (Hebrew language: יהל"ם - יחידה הנדסית למשימות מיוחדות) is a special elite combat engineering unit of the Israeli Engineering Corps of the Israel Defense Forces. The name "Yahalom" (Diamond in Hebrew) is an abbreviation of "Special Operations Engineering Unit". They specialize in covert engineering missions that include everything from Commando and "Counter-Terrorism" missions, planting and defusing explosives (Explosive Ordinance Disposal), landmines, and unexploded ordinance both on land and at sea.

3) "Spooks: Code 9" Series Pre-programming?

 The BBC-3 serial drama "Spooks: Code 9", leaked classified information about a terrorist atrocity  on August 10th 2008.

One of the MI-5 agents in the series explained the term "Code 9" - "A nuclear attack on London. In bomb terms, the blast was relatively small - but the death toll wasn't. Over one hundred thousand (100,000) incinerated and many more given a death sentence by radiation".
Why did they call the series Spooks: Code 9? The original Spooks series was just called "Spooks".The word "Code" indicates that a coded message is being conveyed. Are the events the series fictionalizes being planned to happen in the real world? In episode one of the series, one of the characters strangely asks to have five and a half hours (or 330 minutes) to find the killer of a colleague. Why exactly five and a half hours on the dot?

The one-eye symbolism is the same symbolism as the all-seeing eye on the back of the US dollar and is a favourite symbol of the "Illuminati". Underneath the One-eyed symbol, it says the word "WAR".
The "Illuminati" are using this symbol to indicate that the events portrayed in the series, are planned to take place in the real world and in the foreseeable future.

These clues and the many others in previous articles may be harbingers of what is to come after the Olympics open July 27.
Source:  http://www.henrymakow.com/silverstein_business_partner_o.html 

Insurance Pays Off for Companies With Occult Logos

An article from 2010 by Glenn Bullock 


(left, Westfield Chief Frank Lowy talks shop with office boy, Gordon Brown)







(Westfield-Marriott "terror" attacks in bold)

This is a story about the occult symbolism in the logos of two prominent real estate companies, Westfield Group and Marriott Hotels, and how both have been the target of "terrorist" attacks from which they profited handsomely, thanks to their insurance.

I'd like to show you a "cipher included" word code used by the Westfield and Marriott companies; they use virtually the same one. We'll start with the word Westfield.

The Westfield Company is the world's largest publicly listed retail property group. They are Larry Silverstein's partner at the World Trade Center. The thing to notice with this logo is the unusual font type. It's unique, no other font type has an f so large it obscures another letter; in this case the dot above the i is removed to make room for it!

This is the clue that reveals the cipher; it shows 'dots removed'! How to apply that to discover the puzzle's meaning is next! We have to find where the dots have been removed and replace them to progress!

The W used in Westfield is unlike western W's, because it isn't singularly that! W in that font is also a Hebrew letter that makes two sounds. The letter is called Shin or Sin.

                         

If a dot were placed above the right hand upright the letter is Shin, it makes the Sh sound. If a dot is placed above the left hand upright it's called Sin, and makes the Sss sound. If dots were placed over both we have Shh and Sss. 

Shh means secret and Ssss represents the serpent, Secret Serpent, but only when dots are replaced. Stick with me it builds! 

The Hebrew letter Shin/Sin has a special meaning for Jews as its three upright lines represent the three valleys that converge on Jerusalem! The letter Shin/Sin with dots replaced is Secret Serpent of Jerusalem!

It goes a little deeper yet! Take a look at the middle letters  t f i  on the Westfield logo. They join to form the letter M. A central figure in Serpent Cult (Illuminati) worship is Moloch. The singular use of M represents Moloch.

Moloch was worshiped by the Ammonite tribe who lived in Canaan before Moses and Joshua showed up. The following troubled period of years were called "the mingling", during which time the tribes and knowledge of Jews and Ammonites mingled to some degree! This mingled knowledge is an integral part of modern Freemasonry!

        The Masonic Pillars of Wisdom, Strength and Beauty

forming the letter Shin.

So far in the word puzzle we see 'Secret Serpent of Jerusalem' and 'Moloch,' encrypted and represented in the one word, Westfield, but there's a little more yet. 

The word Westfield refers to a significant Occult place. The Egyptians believed it was bad medicine to have the Sun cast the shadow of the dead Pharaohs over the land in the morning or day; so they always buried them to the west of the Nile, in the west field. 

The shadow of the dead was then cast over the land at night from the west field, when Horus the Sun was killed each night by his opposite, Set, at Sun-Set. Westfield in the Egyptian tradition means place of the death of Horus and, place of the buried dead. Egyptian traditions are also an integral part of modern Freemasonry, which is the religion of Zionism!

Adding together the components of the Westfield word puzzle we get Secret Serpent of Jerusalem place of death/dead, with honor to Moloch a god of Human sacrifice shown in the manufactured M, to whom the sacrifice is traditionally 'passed through the flames unto Moloch'!

The Marriott Company uses virtually the same W type as Westfield, but flipped over to an M for their logo; which includes the encrypted 'Secret Serpent of Jerusalem'. The dot of the i of the Marriott logo is simply omitted to show dots removed.

I think the Marriott Family Company and Westfield have attracted some bad luck using these symbols. They must be the unluckiest property owners in the world!

  

Westfield has had so much bad luck:

9/11: New York, WTC complex buildings one, two, seven and Westfield Hotel demolished in terror attack.  Silverstein and Westfield pocketed $4.5 Billion from 9/11.

21 Sept 05: Westfield Mall, Perth, Australia: bomb scare.

17 May 06: Westfield, Woden, Australia: bomb scare

21 July 07: Court house adjacent Westfield Centre Derby, England: bomb scare causing evacuation of Westfield premises.

01 March 08: Westfield Old Orchard Mall, Skokie, Illinois: bomb scare.

20 April 09: Westfield Hotel Annapolis: bomb scare during Americas next top model competition.

Marriott have also had such bad luck I thought I'd list it:

20 Sept' 08: Marriott Hotel, Islamabad, Pakistan: blown up.

17 July 08: Marriott Hotel, Jakarta: blown up.

17 July 08: Ritz Carlton Hotel, Jakarta: blown up.

Further investigation revealed the Ritz Carlton Company is owned by Marriott!

You may think at this stage that the cipher included word code and I are nuts; but you'll have to agree with me that to lose the Twin Towers, Building Seven, the WTC complex Westfield Hotel, the Islamabad Marriott, the Jakarta Marriott and the Marriott owned Jakarta Ritz Carlton, on top of all those bomb scares, is a really bad run of luck between the Westfield and Marriott companies!

Just to add to the fun the 2008 Bilderberg group meeting was held in Chantilly Virginia at the Westfields Marriott Hotel. Aren't we lucky it didn't blow up!

In February 2009 Westfield owned 119 shopping malls worldwide. One of them is in my home City Derby, England. The Westfield shopping centre is built on an ancient Druid sacrifice site in the City Centre called "The Spot." Westfield also recently built a Hotel in Cannock, England; it is a huge four sided Owl which represents Moloch of Canaan, Arianrhod the Owl god of the Druids and Minerva of the Greek tradition, it is also built on an ancient Druid sacrifice site! These sites are not thick on the ground! 

If any person out there knows of any other points of interest or 'terror incidents' involving Westfield, Marriott or other companies they own, please let me know at glenndavbull@hotmail.co.uk Because they do seem to have a lot of bad luck!

Are the London Olympics a target for a False-Flag Attack?

by Adrian Salbuchi, worldmathaba.net 

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

Please find below an article that I consider to be very important.

Surprisingly (?), it was rejected by those who “normally” publish my works… 

May I ask you kindly help us to spread this information as far and wide as possible.

Thank you and regards,

Adrian Salbuchi (Buenos Aires, Argentina)

"The two fundamental elements for a successful Strategy are: Secrecy and Surprise!” - Juan Domingo Perón (Argentine President & Statesman)

It might be wise to take a closer look at some unnerving indications that the London Olympics might be the stage for a horrific “False Flag” attack, as part of the Global Power Master’s strategic need to break their present global political and economic deadlock.

“False Flag” attacks happen when a militarily strong Nation stages a controlled and very high profile military or terror attack on its own territory and interests, then immediately blaming it on a target foreign power or entity, using it as an excuse to wage war.

Such events carry their tell-tale signs; their “stigmata” so to speak because, when planned, they must include some sort of “communication or cueing mechanism” so that those in the know can make sure neither they, nor their associates, nor loved ones should happen to be in “the wrong place at the wrong time”. 

Is something along these lines on Global Power Master drawing boards for the up-coming London Olympics?   The question would surely sound ludicrous, were it not for a May 2010 Report issued by The Rockefeller Foundation (RF) and Global Business Network (GBN) that “predicts” exactly that. 

Called “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”, it carries introductions by RF president Judith Rodin and GBN chairman Peter Schwartz, both members of the powerful New York-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) think-tank, a key geopolitical planning node of the Global Power structure embedded deep inside the US.

The Report defines its purpose in rather nondescript terms: “The Rockefeller Foundation and GBN began the scenario process by surfacing a host of driving forces that would affect the future of technology and international development. These forces were generated through both secondary research and in-depth interviews with Foundation staff, Foundation grantees, and external experts”. 

Then, they go on to define “the matrix of four very different futures” in store for Mankind:

“(1) Lock-Step: a world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian  leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback” (you can almost see them watering at the mouth over this one!).

“(2) Clever Together: A world in which highly coordinated and successful strategies emerge for addressing both urgent and entrenched worldwide issues”  (definitely no sign whatsoever that today’s power brokers are doing anything even remotely leading to that!)

“(3) Hack Attack: An economically unstable and shock-prone world in which governments weaken, criminals thrive, and dangerous innovations emerge” (more slurpy Power Elite mouth watering with this one!), and,

“(4) Smart Scramble: An economically depressed world in which individuals and communities develop localized, makeshift solutions to a growing set of problems” (and where the powerless suffer and die, whilst the powerful go into high-tech-security ‘business as usual’ mode…)

When detailing Scenario 3 (Hack Attack), we find the following surprising “scenario building” in this Report: “Devastating shocks like September 11, the Southeast Asian tsunami of 2004, and the 2010 Haiti earthquake had certainly primed the world for sudden disasters. But no one was prepared for a world in which large-scale catastrophes would occur with such breathtaking frequency. The years 2010 to 2020 were dubbed the “doom decade” for good reason: the 2012 Olympic bombing which killed 13,000, was followed closely by an earthquake in Indonesia killing 40,000, a tsunami that almost wiped out Nicaragua, and the onset of the West China Famine, caused by a once-in-a-millennium drought linked to climate change.”

“The 2012 Olympic bombing, which killed 13,000”!?!? What a “scenario”!!  …followed by three “natural” disasters” that can probably be artificially triggered by covert technologies such as HAARP and others…

Now, God forbid: but were such a scenario to come true as Rockefeller envisions, it will of course be blamed by the Western governments and its obedient media PsyWar on a grand global “conspiracy” spearheaded by Iran, seconded by Syria, Pakistan and North Korea, applauded by Venezuela, Cuba, facilitated by the Occupy Wall Street, Indignado and Assange movements, and abetted by Russia and China.

A conspiracy to end all conspiracies!  …and a hell of an excuse to “smoke them all out”, unleashing the Dogs of War barking in the nervous arsenals of the US, UK, EU and Israel, whilst clamping down on protesters everywhere.  It would allow launching a revamped “Global War on Terrorism”, Version 4.1.

The Rockefeller Report then adds, “Not surprisingly, this opening series of deadly asynchronous catastrophes (there were more) put enormous pressure on an already overstressed global economy that had entered the decade still in recession…  Most nation-states could no longer afford their locked-in costs, let alone respond to increased citizen demands for more security, more healthcare coverage, more social programs and services, and more infrastructure repair….”  

Wow!! Sounds an awful lot like the world the Global Power Masters are already building and imposing on all of us everywhere!

False Flag events require highly complex, covert and labyrinth-like mega-engineering, absolute secrecy and surprise, and solid buffers isolating the on-going government authorities, whose “total innocence” must be fully safeguarded and believable. 

Presidents and ministers must be able to go live on radio and TV exclaiming with indignation that their country is a victim of “a day that will live in infamy!”, or maybe stand atop the rubble of collapsed towers and yell, megaphone in hand, “The people that did this will hear from us soon!”.

Yet, make no mistake: those who perpetrate false flags know that – in the long run – the truth comes out.  The point here is to make sure that “the long run” is really very, very long.  That when global public opinion finally learns the truth, 60, 80, 100 years down the road, the issue is no longer “political”, but rather a mere historical curiosity.

Whether it’s the sinking of the USS Maine in Cuba which served the US to make war on Spain in 1898, or the sinking of the Lusitania in 1915 which dragged the US into World War I, or Pearl Harbor in 1941 which (again!) dragged America into World War II, or the (non-sinking!) of the USS Maddox in the Gulf of Tonkin in ’64, or the USS Liberty in ’67…  Just make sure the truth comes out generations later when nobody really cares anymore.

Problems however, started piling up on the Global Power Elite when glaring inconsistencies began surfacing over September 11^th and July 5^th in London, whilst they are still very political events, and definitely not yet “history”. 

That’s when lots and lots of political “damage control” has to be brought to bear, with the entailing political cost.

Have the Global Power Masters learned from past mistakes and perfected their military, political and psychological warfare mechanisms?

Are they in such dire straits that they need to pull a really big one like this on the world, as a means of “escaping forwards”?  

Let’s hope it won’t be London… But anyway, let’s stay alert…!

Why the BBC Reported WTC7 Collapse Before it Actually Happened

by Paul Joseph Watson

The BBC has been forced to respond to footage showing their correspondent reporting the collapse of WTC 7 before it fell on 9/11, claiming tapes from the day are somehow missing, and refusing to identify the source for their bizarre act of “clairvoyance” in accurately pre-empting the fall of Building 7.

Here is the BBC’s response to the questions about the footage that was unearthed yesterday, with my comments after each statement.

1. We’re not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn’t get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn’t receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.

“We didn’t get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down.” If this is true, then how on earth did the BBC report the collapse of Building 7 before it happened? Psychic clairvoyance? Of course they were told that WTC 7 was coming down, just like the firefighters, police, first responders and CNN were told it was coming down. They had to have had a source for making such a claim. The BBC is acting like the naughty little boy who got caught with his hand in the cookie jar. No one here is claiming the BBC are “part of the conspiracy,” but their hideous penchant to just repeat what authorities tell them without even a cursory investigation (and with the Building they are telling us has collapsed mockingly filling the background shot of the report), is a damning indictment of their yellow journalism when it comes to 9/11.

2. In the chaos and confusion of the day, I’m quite sure we said things which turned out to be untrue or inaccurate – but at the time were based on the best information we had. We did what we always did – sourced our reports, used qualifying words like “apparently” or “it’s reported” or “we’re hearing” and constantly tried to check and double check the information we were receiving.

How do “chaos and confusion” explain how the BBC reported on the collapse of a building, a collapse that happened “unexpectedly” according to their Conspiracy Files hit piece documentary, before it happened? In one breath the BBC is claiming they were not told of the impending collapse of the Building and in the next they are telling us that all their information is sourced. Which is it to be? Did the BBC have a source telling them the building was about to collapse or not? If not, how on earth could they pre-empt its fall? Do BBC reporters have access to a time machine? What was the source of this information?

3. Our reporter Jane Standley was in New York on the day of the attacks, and like everyone who was there, has the events seared on her mind. I’ve spoken to her today and unsurprisingly, she doesn’t remember minute-by-minute what she said or did – like everybody else that day she was trying to make sense of what she was seeing; what she was being told; and what was being told to her by colleagues in London who were monitoring feeds and wires services.

Trying to make sense of what she was being told? She obviously didn’t make much sense of the fact that the Building she was reporting had collapsed was prominently standing behind her! Unfotunately, for a news organization that prides itself on accuracy and credibility, “she doesn’t remember” just doesn’t cut it as an excuse.

4. We no longer have the original tapes of our 9/11 coverage (for reasons of cock-up, not conspiracy). So if someone has got a recording of our output, I’d love to get hold of it. We do have the tapes for our sister channel News 24, but they don’t help clear up the issue one way or another.

We are asked to believe that the world’s premiere news organization has somehow lost all its tapes of perhaps the biggest news event of the past 60 years. This is a copout. Whether they have lost the tapes or not, the BBC simply doesn’t want to verify one hundred per cent their monumental foul-up, because they know it would only increase the exposure of this issue and lead to further questions. What is there to clear up? The reporter is standing in front of the building while saying it has already collapsed! This is a blatant effort to try and placate people making complaints while refusing to admit a monumental faux pas that further undermines the BBC’s credibility in the aftermath of the Conspiracy Files debacle.

5. If we reported the building had collapsed before it had done so, it would have been an error – no more than that. As one of the comments on You Tube says today “so the guy in the studio didn’t quite know what was going on? Woah, that totally proves conspiracy… “

So now the BBC are so devoid of answers, they have to enlist the help of some moronic comment on a You Tube blog? Instead of issuing official statements and seeking the advice of legal professionals they produce a cobbled together five paragraph blog and include the testimony of some moron on a You Tube comment board. Pathetic! Answer the question BBC – what was your source for reporting on multiple occasions that Building 7 had collapsed before it had collapsed, and identify the source that enabled the anchorman to comment that the building had collapsed due to it being weakened, an explanation still unanswered by NIST five and a half years later.

If you had reported the collapse of the twin towers before it happened would that have been just an error too? This “error” translated as $800 million plus in insurance bounty for Larry Silverstein – I’m sure Industrial Risk Insurers would be interested to know the source of your “error.” In addition, two seperate sources reported that Secret Service Agent Craig Miller died as a result of the collapse of Building 7. Do you think he would have been interested in the “error” that led to your correspondent reporting the building’s downfall in advance?

Source

Will There Be A Terrorist Attack at the 2012 London Olympics?

by Christopher Woodward, suite101.com, International Affairs

Movies, TV programmes, the print media and card games all present evidence of a looming terror threat planned for the 2012 London Olympics.

In 1995 Steve Jackson’s Illuminati: New World Order game was released. The playing cards depict numerous events and initiatives which can be used or implemented as a means towards achieving the ultimate aim of world domination. Included among them are an Internet Worm, an Epidemic, Gun Control, introducing State Lotteries, use of Subliminals and just about every natural disaster thinkable.

Two of the most interesting cards are the Terrorist Nuke and Pentagon cards. Both have pictures that, incredibly, almost perfectly depict the attack of 9/11, over six years before the event took place.

The first episode of the TV drama series, The Lone Gunman, aired in March 2001, involved a US government conspiracy to hijack a commercial airliner and fly it into the World Trade Centre, then blame it on terrorists to gain support for a profit-making war.

In May 2004, a BBC Panorama programme was broadcast featuring a mock exercise of a terrorist attack in London, with a bombing of three underground trains and a road vehicle. This was the very same scenario that was to take place during the 7/7 2005 London Bombings.

The fact that the real life 9/11 and 7/7 bombings both have an uncanny resemblance to previous fictional terrorist attacks is evidence that these were not entirely random events, and the so-called ‘conspiracy theorists’ that claim these were inside jobs may have a point.

There are many cirlces that believe the world, including most of the mass media, is controlled by a shadowy group known as the illuminati, who employ various symbols and a numerology as code language to demonstrate their existence and unveil their future plans.

In recent years there have been many signs within the media signalling a planned terrorist attack at the 2012 London Olympics. Former oilfield executive and geo-political researcher Ian Crane, goes so far as to predict that a fake alien invasion will take place, planned by the global elite to usher in the new world order. It must be stated that all the signs fall well short of being proof that a terrorist attack will take place, and are based upon questionable theories. However they do present a sufficient body of evidence to signal a timely warning.

Spooks: Code 9. A Warning from the BBC? 

Spooks: Code 9 was a spy drama series broadcast by the BBC in August 2008 and set in 2012, in the aftermath of a nuclear attack at the London Olympics that had taken place during the opening ceremony.

There are a number of scenes in the drama in which the background contains the all-seeing eye symbol, as displayed on dollar notes, and commonly placed in the background on the logos of many corporations. It is thought to signal a coded message from the illuminati.

The all-seeing eye is similarly displayed on the homepage of Kudos, the production company behind Spooks: Code 9, and also depicted on Wenlock and Mandeville, the London 2012 official mascots.

In the first episode, a character asks to have exactly 330 minutes to find a killer. What may appear to be an unusual and illogical amount of time to request, may actually be a deliberately coded message. The number 330 may be a reference to 33, which points to the 33 degrees of Freemasonry. This could be a sign that the Freemasons are behind the programme and are conveying a secret coded message. The decision to include the phrase Code 9 in the title could be a signal towards a coded message in the programme, conveying that the events that take place in the series are planned to happen in the real world.

Other Evidences That Point Towards a Planned Terror Attack

The movie 2012 contains a scene in which a character is looking for a map inside a plane when trying to escape an exploding volcano. The first map he picks up and then fully opens is a map of the London underground, which can be clearly seen to viewers. Is this a sign of a future threat in London in 2012?

The late August 2011 edition of the British political satire magazine Private Eye had a cover title with the words ‘Olympic Rehearsal’, accompanied by an image of the recent London riots containing a speech balloon with the words ‘This is the worst opening ceremony ever.’

Another card used in the Illuminati game has a picture of Big Ben being blown up and five men, each of them wearing different colours, red, blue, yellow, green and black - the same colours of the five Olympic rings. In the same way as the cards depicting the 9/11 attacks, could this card be a sign of a planned terrorist attack at the London Olympics?

In July 2005, soon after London had won the bid to host the Olympics, it was reported that the Olympic Park site where the Games were planned to take place is the site of a former nuclear reactor.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation released a report entitled Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development. In one of the potential future scenarios considered, the report stated that, “the years 2010 to 2020 were dubbed the “doom decade” for good reason; the 2012 Olympic bombing, which killed 13,000….”

Given that the number 13 is considered to be a key number used by the illuminati to reveal a secret coded message, and the significance of the Rockefeller Foundation in working to bring about a new world order behind the scenes, alongside other tax-exempt foundations, is this report yet another sign of a planned terrorist attack at the London Olympics?

Conspiracy Theory or Genuine Threat?

Undoubtedly, when presented with the evidence, many readers will ask, "Why would they want to do that?" The purpose of a planned terrorist attack, if it were to happen, would be as a means to move rapidly towards the goal of totalitarian world government. As David Rockfeller said at a 1994 United Nations dinner "We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."

It is entirely possible the Olympics will take place without any threats or disturbances, and if it does, it cannot be legitimately argued that this was the result of the threat being made known to enough people, as some conspiracy theorists may wish to suggest. Nor can it be said that, if a terrorist attack does take place, that it is definitely the result of the Illuminati.

Nevertheless, the evidence available is sufficient to warrant the need for a warning to be issued and for the evidence to be laid out to the public. This is especially true considering the signs preceding 9/11 and other atrocities.

Ultimately, whether a terror attack will happen or not, only time will tell.